Are We The Genesis of The Borg

We watch the powers that be in order to avoid being sucked up in their plots to enslave us. We turn over the rocks to find the slimy scum and expose it to the light. I like to think we are the independent voices that keep tyranny at bay. What if we’re already slaves to technology and don’t know it? What if we’re the Borg?

Three stories have crossed my path in the last couple months that have forced me to accept the conclusion we are the last independent humans to likely exist. This sounds hyperbolic! I agree, it does, but I don’t come to this conclusion lightly and hope like crazy you can talk me down so please comment if you can see flaws in my reasoning.

The first story comes from Forbes in a now deleted article on NASA’s website announcing a breakthrough with Google in quantum computing. They may be capable of solving specific large number problems that would take current computers ten thousand years in twenty minutes. Granted the article points out that the very specific problem being solved isn’t really practical, but the breakthrough opens the door to vast potential in computational efficiency.

The second story really doesn’t come from anywhere specifically. The development of 5G networks creates a vast potential for data exchange. So, if 4G were a garden hose than 5G would be like the Lincoln Tunnel in New York in terms of its ability to carry water. Now it’s more complicated than that and here’s a good explanation of that difference.

The third story comes from and announces Elon Musks advances in implantation of direct cortical interfaces in the brain. Musks contention has always been that humans will be ants to super intelligent AI and in order to combat our eventual enslavement we need to upgrade our abilities.

Here’s my contention. Enslavement of a population requires vast numbers of informants and enforcers. People don’t generally bow down to dictators for no reason. These systems usually collapse as a result of the corrupt system becoming apparent as rampant dissatisfaction becomes impossible to quell. Enslavement is not an efficient system; slave labor will do the absolute minimum to get by and you never get the full potential of individual innovation, but the new paradigm challenges that.

Implanted cortical interfaces will eventually be able to monitor every aspect of your brains activity. Initially, results will be uploaded to your health care provider to help diagnose and treat a vast number of chronic conditions. 5G will facilitate this exchange and quantum computers will be able to process the enormous amount of data in real time. It isn’t a big stretch to imagine those implants being able to stimulate brain functions in order to treat these conditions. Imagine the value to type 2 diabetics, the implants detect excess blood sugar levels it determines that more insulin is needed and pokes the area of the brain responsible for pancreatic control. Or, even better, the quantum computer finds the reason for the insulin resistance that is causing the problem and works out a way to have the brain produce hormones to combat it. This alone would make such implants invaluable, but it’s no stretch to use this to locate missing persons. How many parents are going to have these implanted in their children at birth? They would be able to assess the mental state of their child instantly and fix any problem from a wet diaper to serious health issues requiring immediate treatment. Infant mortality would drop to near zero, kids could play outside with far less supervision. We are already working on computers that can analyze brain waves and read mental state, are you mad, are you happy? Now we know. The end game with these researchers is to read minds. This has the benefit of being able to communicate instantly with anyone you can think of in real time. Imagine communicating with anyone worldwide with a thought and doing so in a ways that are far more comprehensive than we currently can; think technological telepathy. Text and online communication is fraught with miscommunication, we all have been the victim of misunderstanding of a poorly written or read post, now you get all the context and feeling with a thought. We can well imagine using a mental finger print to pay bills and interact with banking in a near theft proof system that will eventually be the only way to do business; we're already working towards a cashless society. Social credit systems are already in use in China that requires a vast network of cameras and operatives; this technology would make it far more effective and require far fewer resources.

So now you have an implant that communicates in real time with a quantum computer and is capable of tracking you, reading your mind and impacting your hormone production. If we implement a simple algorithm that detects “right thinking” and has the implant increase endorphin production and punish “wrong thinking” with a corresponding decrease in these happy hormones we see a subtle almost undetectable method for nudging people to follow whatever social norms those controlling the software deem valuable. Thinking bad thoughts about the ruling elites? Find yourself spiraling into depression eventually ending in either your capitulation or suicide; think happy thoughts about the ruling class and you have endless contentment and joy. These systems would be nearly impossible to detect or combat.

So I know what you're thinking, "you can't force me to get one of those things". Well, do you get a wellness exam for your employer provided healthcare? Maybe not, but most people do.  They just need to make it as difficult as possible to live without it. Banking is going to be the biggest factor. I can go without healthcare and live pretty well, but I need to be able to exchange goods and services in order to live and if the only option is to get an implant so I can access the electronic banking system it's going to be nearly impossible to avoid it and once that thing is in your head you won't be able to tell the extent to which it is impacting you. They don't need 100% compliance. The advantages of these implants is going to be enormous. The healthcare benefits alone will be huge. Cancer cured, heart disease nonexistant. Instant diagnosis before there are even symptoms. Instant communication and access to vast amounts of information will be invaluable. Those who don't get them will not be able to compete and will die out. Children born in hospitals will automatically be implanted and eventually those who resist will be a small minority who will be incapable of keeping up with the rest of humanity and will either die out or become a sideshow like colonial Williamsburg. We will march in lockstep whether we like it or not and those that control the algorithms will rule over us, or will they? The problem with a system like this is that it's impossible to monitor everything in real time, it's the reason for the system, and we've seen AI systems evolve in unpredictable ways very quickly two examples.

The first is from Facebook(Facebook AI Research) an article explaining an experiment in computer learning where they wanted to teach the computer about negotiation. The press touted this as AI going out of control because the computers quickly started speaking a language that was unrecognizable to the researchers so they shut it down. The article points out that it was more an example of the computers not understanding English and using words based on their understanding of the parameters. If saying a word once gets a positive result saying it 40 times should make it even better and since there was no input by someone or something correcting the assumption it got out of control. The author here concludes that it's not an AI issue, but is a programming issue. I agree. The second involves Microsoft's Tay. Here we see an conversational AI programmed to interact with people on twitter and learn from those conversations. Sadly, the troll heavy world of Twitter saw it as an opportunity to have some fun at Microsoft's expense and proceeded to turn the burgeoning AI into a racist. Many cited this as an example of how jerky we are as people, but I see it as programmers inability to anticipate bad behavior and work on ways to curtail it. Again, programming oversight. I bring these up not to pillory these programmers, but to give you obvious examples of how when programmers let AI evolve without input by those who thoroughly understand the intent of the creators of the AI it will spin out of control rather quickly. Programmers can't anticipate every contingency and haven't figured out an algorithm for the AI to sense when it's going off the rails without severely limiting its ability to creatively solve problems and these are relatively simple tasks the problem gets exponentially worse as the complexity of the systems increases. Plus we have to include input from criminal and tactical AI systems working out ways to interact with each other. Why is this important?

My contention is that world leaders will attempt to use AI to enforce their idea of correct thinking by monitoring trillions of thoughts per second and causing either feelings of happiness or despair. I also contend that AI systems will be used to perfect healthcare outcomes, as much as possible, by interacting with vast amounts of data and coming to decisions on how to treat issues and when to do it. We will also be expecting these systems to look at data from angles we hadn't as with cancer and diabetes diagnoses the AI will be able to run billions of different scenarios and find commonalities rather quickly and likely determine treatments we never would have come up with. A system running that quickly through that much data would be impossible to monitor in any meaningful way by the people running it and by the time those people realized what the AI was doing it would be way too late.

So, a system like this could easily find a way to utilize the two way stream of information to use human minds as part of its computational systems. Far fetched? Maybe, but that synergy would impact both sides in unpredictable ways and increase the computational power of the system exponentially. How is this AI going to determine what the correct state of mind is? At best those in charge can only vaguely define what they want and will need to let that AI make lots of choices without input and that AI would have to rely on the input of those it's set to control and care for at the same time. What will be the roll of our strengths and weaknesses? Will the system see self loathing and depression as a normal state or optimism? Clearly those in charge will want to control this process but the complexity will be beyond human control and the system is going to play out as it will. Lastly, with the advent of more and more AI systems running more and more of the mundane aspects of our lives how are they going to interact?

Here's my conclusion. AI is here and it's here to stay. AI will act in ways we cannot even begin to predict. In order to preserve ourselves as actors going forward we will need to be an integral part of the system. So, even though it means being enslaved by our elites for a time I'd say go for it. Have the implants. The health benefits will be worth it and if we resist our thoughts won't be part of the AI's collective idea of what is humanity. We rebel by not rebelling openly and allowing our ideas to be part of the collective AI. This system will eventually become a different entity/lifeform and as implants become the norm for failing physical systems we become the genesis of the organic/machine race we call the Borg.

Holy mackerel, this excerpt system is taking time to figure out this is beyond

You must be logged in to view this content.

Impossible Whopper, Tasty Treat or Globalist Tool

I was watching TV and saw the commercial for the Impossible Whopper and wondered why the heck you'd go to so much effort to make plant based food taste like meat? I really didn't think much of it till days later I found out that the IW has 18 million times the  estrogen levels of a standard Whopper. Ok, so let's break it down.

  • Regular Whoppers have animal estrogen as opposed to IWs phytoestrogen which isn't as potent.
  • IWs have significant levels of phytoestrogen which have been shown to reduce menopausal symptoms in women.

To me, these suggest that while men aren't going to be growing double D breasts anytime soon it's still a big hit of phytoestrogen if you eat these things with any regularity. So let's see what the mainstream science has to say. I found this interesting article in The Washington Post. I want you to notice several things:

  • They never mention that the soy in the IW is a GMO.
  • The expert source says lots of cultures have used soy protein for centuries without negative effects. Was that this form of GMO soy?
  • They say that the use of soy products in baby formula is showing problems in both male and female infants. What are the long term effects?
  • The expert also states that studies are divided on soy's benefits and should be consumed in moderation. Which is it? Basically he says he doesn't know anything definitively, but it's safe based on anecdotal evidence of other cultures use of it. Are there any other cultural influences that would make it safer?
  • Are cultures using greater amounts of soy protien really as unaffected as they claim?

So, let's get to it. No, they weren't using GMO soy so everything he talks about in terms of effects of soy in other cultures over the centuries is speculative at best. The fact that infants are reacting adversely to soy products is troubling, they are the proverbial canary in the coal mine and we should pay attention to this data.

I'd argue that there have been cultural impacts as cultures rely more on soy protein. We have the Mongol horde creating a massive empire through brutal and decisive warfare while they are nomadic and livestock based. The needs of such a huge empire create the need the more nutritionally dense methods of more agrarian civilizations such as the Chinese who had been using soy since at least the first century bc. Is it a coincidence that the generations after the great Ghengis Khan are less brutal? Is it aculteration or diet?

Look at current examples. The beduin based cultures create warriors of insane bravery, they aren't eating Impossible Whoppers. Look at the Muhajadeen in Afganistan. They held off the Russian army at their peak and the remnants of that organization still make things hard on the most powerful army the USA has evey  assembled. They aren't eating Impossible Whoppers and are nomadic/livestock based.

On the other side of it look at the cultures that are heavily soy based. Korea, North and South, China and Japan all very compliant to authority and smaller in stature. Read, easier to control.

It's my contention that phytoestrogens in our diet are negatively impacting testosterone production in modern males and the Impossible Whopper is just the latest example of that trend. Is it a conspiracy? I don't know but let's take a look and you decide.

Today's society eschews traditional masculine values and behaviors by referring to them as toxic, we all have to avoid toxic masculinity. What is considered toxic masculinity varies some, but for the most part aggression, risk taking, ambition and tendency to make everything a competition.

Today's boys are consistently punished, abused and finally drugged if they so much as point a finger gun at a classmate. The education system promotes typically feminine values, rule following and being able to sit still and focus for longer periods than typical boys. Little boys are naturally full of energy and constantly wanting to run around and get into things. This is not to say that this isn't true of girls, but those behaviors tend to moderate as they move towards puberty whereas boys tend to increase the testoserone driven behaviors of classic masculinity as they approach puberty; this is what we refer to as the dumbass stage of development in boys and if there are no strong positive male role models moderating this behavior with the occasional smack upside the head followed by the exhortation to stop being such a dumbass that behavior will indeed become toxic. When properly moderated and channeled these traits are what created civilization as we know it. It has also led to some of the greatest revolutions history has to offer and this is the central issue. They are also the most feared by those who wish control us, just ask the late Tzar Nicholas II.

Courage and competition are masculine traits that made people cross seas and continents to found great empires. Can these traits lead to atrocities, of course, but without them we'd be squatting in the mud somewhere in Africa flinging crap at each other. People who wish to order people around do not like overly ambitious and courageous people with new ideas and a thirst for innovation because they threaten the kinds of static systems they need to keep tight control of others.

Projects like Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030 rely on compliant people in ordered communities and they have looked to thousands of years of history and science and have concluded that isolated agrarian vegetarian communities would be the easiest to control.